The prevailing cosmological model for explaining the universe’s early development is the Big Bang theory. The Dutch Paradigm suggests a sequence of initial events before this early development.
Numerous theories about the Big Bang exist, especially regarding the brief period following this significant event. We won’t outline these theories here in detail as none of them have been shown to be consistent with a comprehensive logical explanation. Similarly, religious explanations are not widely accepted either. The belief in eternity and a paradise lost has been deeply ingrained in humanity. These descriptions were once acceptable to our ancestors but are no longer considered logical explanations by the scientific community.
A common thread in almost all theories that currently prevail and attract credible scientific attention is a strong belief that some form of manifestation of mass as a property of matter and similarly that of energy could be and was concentrated at an extremely high density. Before the Big Bang, both of these physical phenomena were assumed to be in a kind of “hot spot.” Most scientists are reluctant to accept that the very beginning of the universe emerged from a singularity. One of the originators of the Big Bang theory was Monsignor Georges Lemaȋtre, a Roman Catholic priest. He thought that:
If the world has begun with a single quantum, the notions of space and time would altogether fail to have any meaning at the beginning; they would only begin to have a sensible meaning when the original quantum had been divided into a sufficient number of quanta. If this suggestion is correct, the beginning of the world happened a little before the beginning of space and time.
It is also obvious that the Albert Einstein’s equation E=mc² has serious constraints for application in a singularity or whatever definition of such a hot spot.
It does not allow for mass in such a singularity.
There is a high lack of clarity on what happened in the very first period of the beginning of our universe, up to the universe’s first seconds. Having said this, we must acknowledge that both measuring time and stating a time lapse in seconds, refers to our perception of measurable dimensions. Nevertheless, it is possible to use this system of measurements as our standard, and as a result, we have defined, therefore, the International System of Units(or the SI system).
There are various representations of the present state of speculations regarding this first period.
This graphic representation shows most of the actual ideas.
Source RedOrbit
Within one second after the Big Bang, fundamental particles and their interactions reached a state of a kind of metastable equilibrium, influenced by four different types of forces: the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, the electromagnetic force, and gravity. Intensive research involving particle reduction has led to the development of the Standard Model of Fundamental Particles and Interactions.
So far the scientific understanding of the prevailing cosmological ideas on the Big Bang.
Hereafter is a proposition for a potential alternative explanation for the initial events. It is a fundamentally different concept and crucial to comprehend the new paradigm discussed on this site.
In this explanation, we will utilize familiar concepts such as space and time. These concepts will only be used to illustrate the idea, so we must relate them to a set of concepts commonly perceived as physical reality. Monsignor Georges Lemaȋtre also suggested that these concepts require further understanding, which will be discussed later in this study.
According to the law of conservation of energy, we can logically conclude that there was an initial outburst of an enormous amount of energy at the very start of the universe. This assumes that this law became valid only after this first short period. The physical universe came into existence as a result of this phenomenon. The word “outburst” is used to describe the sudden appearance of energy that seemingly did not exist before. After this brief initial period, various impacts and forces become active and interfere with the manifestations of entities caused by this free, uncompensated energy.
Herewith we like to suggest that this could well have happened in three specific stages:
- A status in which there was no observable physical exposure to energy or other physical phenomena at all
- An apparent outburst of manifestations of energy during a very short period of what we call time
- A period in which all kind of forces became active to create some order and transformations due to inference of the exposed free energy on entities
This third period is relatively well known. It is the center of many theories, which range from describing the composition of atoms to the theory of evolution. Our description of the Universe’s beginning is necessarily a simplified model. As a result, we can scientifically only make claims about the principles that might have been at play, allowing us to observe them.
What might have occurred during the first two periods and the initial moments of the third period?
PERIOD 1.
The first status is a status in which there was no energy exposure.
When we examine this scenario, where there was neither a physical manifestation nor detectable energy, we can logically conclude that there was no physical exposure whatsoever. It is possible that some form of confinement existed in what we define as potential energy. To keep this energy at rest and to avoid exposure, it is necessary to compensate with another form of energy that can balance with this state of perpetual rest. In this case, potential energy does not induce any motion at all.
This balancing arrangement was perfect up until the beginning of the universe.
However, a balance on what?
We would like to introduce entities into the discussion now.
Whether we refer to them as entities, virtual particles, or point particles, it means that the assumption is that they were manifestations of energy that were linked to entities and were actively interacting and counteracting and that these energies were perfectly balanced to be physically at rest. The entities are dimensionless and can only be evidenced by their manifestations. If these manifestations were perfectly balanced and only had potential energy, then there would be nothing physically detectable in the universe—just a state of rest in a singularity.
Apparently, this state of perfect rest was interrupted for a very brief period that we refer to as time.
PERIOD 2.
An apparent outburst of manifestations of energy during a very short period of what we refer to as time.
When this state of perfect rest was disrupted, unbalanced energy carriers became physically observable. This was likely due to the energy of nature, which we experience as electrical energy. We observe that it has characteristics related to electrical ‘charges.’
We know that electrical charges of the same nature repel each other.
These forces result from electric charges, indicated as q₁ and q₂.
Due to our familiarity with electric charges bound to particles, we have an underlying assumption that these forces can affect so-called fermions. The repulsive force can accelerate fermions in a near field, so the forces are relative to the distance between two fermions that carry electric charges. The scalar and vector forms of the mathematical equation are:
and 
respectively
There is a valid argument to suggest that this assumption should not be restricted to fermions. The mathematical expression does not suggest that mass manifestation is necessary for a force to act on the entities involved.
Let us assume that during this short period in which this perfect balance was absent, all the entities subject to this event generated a physical manifestation of an uncompensated, free amount of electric energy that exercised repelling forces relative to each other. These forces brought the related entities into physical motion, and “space and time” emerged. In other words, the related entities were on the move and showed their existence by their physical manifestation caused by their (free) electric energy.
Note: The concepts of space and time will be subject to clarification within the framework of The Dutch Paradigm. This leads to the question: Have these massless entities accelerated from zero to the speed of light in this brief period? We will refrain from discussing this issue at this stage of explaining the Dutch Paradigm. The question is linked to our notion of time and assumes that time is a continuous phenomenon. This issue is not addressed in the prevailing theories as well, though we accept – as in Quantum Physics – that we cannot conclude the status of phenomena within the transition up to the consecutive Planck period.
We observe a space around us in three dimensions, so we may assume that these entities also show their physical existence with their electric energy manifestations in a three-dimensional universe.
PERIOD 3:
It is the long-lasting period in which all kinds of forces become active to create some order and transformations related to the exposed free energy on entities.
After a brief interval, the compensating counteractive energy began to exert its influence once more on every entity. This counteractive energy is commonly known to us as magnetism, and it is an integral part of the duality of the electromagnetic system. Henceforth, we can acknowledge this duality as the electromagnetic wave of an entity.
This system of active and counteractive energy – the magnetic manifestation – started again, but in its original capacity. It cannot compensate for the portion of uncompensated, free electric energy as was a manifestation of the entity in the short period of the outburst, period 2.
We observe that the total amount of free energy exposed to space is fixed and preserved from that moment on. The observable universe was in existence, and the perception of time had started.
In a short-simplified animation:
A crucial question now to be addressed:
Suppose we have a fixed amount of free energy available as a physical manifestation of entities with retarded magnetic compensation. What meaning could this hold for us as conscious human observers?