The Dutch Paradigm’s concept of the electron as a construct connects to theories about the origin of the universe. It presents a precise and constructive account of events.
These ideas translated into a simple animation showing:
moreover, the crucial question was raised:
If we have a fixed amount of available free electric energy as a physical manifestation of the existence of entities, with retarded magnetic compensation, what could this mean for us as conscious human observers?
The Dutch Paradigm clarifies that the beginning of the universe leads to the identification of the source of the particle/wave duality. Both the photon and neutrino exhibit this particle/wave duality behavior.
The ‘particle’ aspect of the particle/wave duality directly relates to the events that occurred in the early universe during period 2. During this time, there was a release of energy – free, uncompensated energy that can seemingly be transformed by interference into other forms, such as ‘mass.’ This energy will always serve as the source for altering reality as perceived by human observers.
The concepts regarding the origin of the universe, as outlined in The Dutch Paradigm, require clarification for better comprehension. There is a fundamental assumption that this universe exists with intention. Acceptance of such an intention is not necessary for discussing or accepting the related assumptions relevant to clarifying the new paradigm. Therefore, providing additional explanations on how we perceive the universe would be beneficial.
First, within science, we also assume that “our” universe had an origin and has since developed into its present form, which is what conscious observers may experience.
There is currently no evidence of the reoccurrence of such an event. Our physical universe may not be the only one in existence. Additionally, we don’t know for certain whether the actual beginning of the universe was indeed a beginning or a kind of transformational process.
There is no hard evidence in this first period of a sequence of events that follows a physical law of nature.
Wikipedia for a law of nature:
A theoretical principle deduced from particular facts, applicable to a defined group or class of phenomena, and expressible by the statement that a particular phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions are present. Physical laws are typically conclusions that are based on repeated scientific experiments and observations over many years and which have become universally accepted within the scientific community.
Observation arises from individual sensory perception. These perceptions result from a highly intricate process in which large numbers of photons interact with our senses and send signals to our brains. We are able to communicate with others about what we see and feel as if we all live in a physical world and can agree on shared observations.
This way of observing and understanding the content of perceived experiences is so universally accepted that we often fail to realize – from a purely scientific point of view – that this process is still very mysterious. It is nearly impossible to technically translate the impact of photons into an overview that explains what is recognized when we ‘see’ reality with our eyes. Grasping and interpreting the image until it is recognized is a mind-boggling capability. These photons can apparently interact in a specific and meaningful way in our eyes. To quote Johan Wolfgang von Goethe: “The eye was made by the light, for the light, so that the inner light may emerge to meet the outer light.” This enigmatic process marks the beginning of our cognitive process of finding logic in what we observe. The world enlightens itself by virtually projecting pictures into our thought processes.
The processing of information can serve as a reference to clarify certain assumptions of The Dutch Paradigm. While it may be a side note, it is still important for this site on particle physics. It will not challenge the documented observations, but it will contribute to the discussion of some explanations for observed phenomena that are not (yet) part of the scientific community’s present state of acceptable interpretations.
When we look at the night sky, we observe information transmitted to us by photons. These photons have traveled vast distances, with some having traveled without encountering any physical object, while others have had their last encounter just a few years ago. The total picture reflects the “Lebenstableau” of the universe. We see what happened up to what we assume is the start of our universe. We can see and study this scenic history of the universe in great detail, supported by technical means like telescopes to translate the photonic information into a crisp picture of the reality of the past. The images we have today are more detailed than what we can see with our naked eyes thanks to technology that shifts frequencies into the visible part of the spectrum. We can study these images to learn more about the history of the universe.
This Lebenstableau indicates that according to our current set of logical explanations, the universe had a beginning, which we can observe, as human beings who are aware of their consciousness.
The name for this event is the Big Bang.