It is not possible to create more complex nuclei just by combining protons together.
Two protons in close proximity will repel if their electric vectors point in the same direction, preventing the formation of a new structure.
However, there is a possibility that two protons will assemble and form a new structure.
We now understand that in the single dodecahedron structure, there are pairs of electric vectors that neutralize each other’s effects. These pairs are similar to the electron/positron configuration but are separated and can neutralize but not annihilate each other. These vectors still exist but act in opposition to each other in their electrical impact on the assembled dodecahedron.
If we start by focusing our attention on the proton, we can sketch out the following scheme:
The schematic representation of the neutron and the proton is: the model allows for the assumption that two protons can indeed merge while compensating for each other’s electric vectors.
The model assumes that, indeed, two protons can merge while compensating for the mutual effects of each other’s electric vectors.
There are two possibilities:
In the first version, there are two empty faces in the central binding face (the yellow face that is empty in both constituent dodecahedrons). In contrast, the second version shows two blue faces with opposite charge vectors, which allows for the formation of a neutron bond. The remaining electric vectors of the two proton configurations point in opposite directions. This arrangement compensates for one another, resulting in a two-proton configuration that has no charge and no spin. Once again, the resulting structure is dark matter. It is conceivable that such particles exist and can be detected solely through their mass.
In regular science, the neutron plays a crucial role in forming configurations of multiple protons that exhibit active electrical behavior outside the nucleus.
The first incident involves an ion structure or nucleus where one neutron binds to a proton, forming the nucleus of deuterium.
The outcome of this event seems to follow a straightforward calculation rule. The neutron attaches itself to the vacant side of a proton, which is indicated as yellow. The neutron’s oscillation synchronizes with the proton, and the spin is a full integer value. Deuterium’s stability is high, although not extremely high.
The next step is a possible configuration of the nucleus of tritium.
The resulting electric manifestation is +1, and the spin is ½. Tritium has an average lifetime of about 12.32 years and decays into Helium-3 due to the neutron being bound to the proton. Two photon vectors point in opposite directions on the compounding plane, with a neutrino in the center. Although all dodecahedrons are oscillating in sync, this specific area—this face—is particularly vulnerable to incidental interference from an external magnetic field. Such interference can trigger the left dodecahedron to fall out of synchronization, causing the neutron bond to flip into a proton bond. As a result, the two negative charge vectors within one dodecahedron will align in the same direction, leading to an effective repelling force. The green dodecahedron on the right side could undergo the same process. Therefore, we can conclude that while the tritium nucleus is relatively stable, it is susceptible to decay when exposed to a strong magnetic field. The magnetic field must be sufficiently strong because, with an average lifespan of 12 years, the electrically active nucleus may have already formed into an atom with an electron in the first shell. A neutron can bind to a proton, but as long as these bonds remain neutron-based, they carry a risk of instability.
In the next stage of developing more complex nuclei, a proton attaches to the deuterium nucleus, forming Helium-3.
The neutron is positioned between two protons. It binds with one proton in an empty compounding plane, similar to the deuterium nucleus, and with the other proton in a blue face, one with a gamma photon and without a neutrino. The direction of the two photons’ vectors is opposite. This configuration seems stable because all faces oscillate in the same mode. If one of the neutron’s dodecahedrons oscillates out of synchronization, the nucleus decays. The two gamma photons would point in the same direction vector-wise and repel the same electric charge in the neighboring protons. The binding areas induce synchronization and most probably cause some reduction of frequencies of the constituents and a small addition to the ‘mass’ manifestation as per the regular paradigm.
This relatively small difference in frequency is the unique signature of each element in the Periodic Table of Elements.
The next step is Helium-4
Helium-4 forms by addition of another neutron to Helium-3.
There are two extra proton bonds in this configuration, two in the same vector direction and two in the opposite direction.
One example of such a configuration is:
There are two extra proton bonds, two in the same vector direction and two in the opposite direction.
The stability of such a configuration is limited. On the right side, we have two vectors pointing in the same direction, and that indicates possible decay. The decay of the neutron into a proton in combination with properties of the proton bonds will increase the stability of the construct.
This configuration is:
It is stable. There is a link available of some strong proton bonds with their resulting electric vectors in the same direction, separated by two dodecahedrons.
As from this configuration, it is difficult to assign each dodecahedron to its origin, being part of a proton or a neutron. It becomes fuzzy, but the functionality per single dodecahedron is very well identifiable.
Configuring along this line of thinking makes next steps predictable as well. Up to this point, the build-up of configurations is represented in a line format only, to clarify the principles. The factual configuration process results in more spatial structures, possibly with additional neutrons, but they still adhere to the postulated structuring principles.
Dodecahedrons can form more complex spatial nuclei by using more faces with the neutron bond and other faces in combinations of twin dodecahedrons for proton bonds that are electrically neutral to the outside world.
The rules to configure the nuclei for the elements can be translated into an algorithm with indications for stability and the presence of isotopes.